Cartoon Critique
Wednesday, May 25, 2016
Moving to Wordpress
Hey all, I wanted to inform you that I will no longer be making review posts on Cartoon Critique. For a number of reasons (one of which is expanding to other forms of reviews like games, movies, and books), I have chosen to start writing reviews on Wordpress instead. Here is a link to the new page. I've already finished my first review on the new site, so go ahead and check it out. I'll also probably be posting revised versions of my reviews from this page, so keep a look out for them, too.
Monday, March 14, 2016
Follow Cartoon Critique on Facebook
Hey everyone, I know this blog doesn't get updated all that frequently, but I'm going to try to start releasing new reviews on a more regular basis (at least once a month). If you're interested, click the link below to join the Cartoon Critique Facebook page so that you'll be alerted about new updates to the blog. Thanks for reading!
Click here to go to the Cartoon Critique Facebook page!
Click here to go to the Cartoon Critique Facebook page!
Friday, March 11, 2016
Random Rant: Is Zootopia Racist?
WARNING: SPOILERS
For those who haven't herd (get it?), Disney's latest installment Zootopia has been a huge success, grossing nearly $300 million so far and receiving an astonishing 99% Fresh Rating on Rotten Tomatoes. Being praised by many as one of the best Disney films in decades and even as one of the best police movies in years (yeah, a Disney movie about anthropomorphic animals. Go figure), Zootopia is definitely going to be in the running for Best Animated Feature at next year's Oscars. There are a lot of things about this movie that have made it so well received - including fantastic writing, beautiful animation, and spot-on voice acting - but the factor that most critics have focused on is the movie's underlying message about racial equality.
See, while Zootopia may appear to be a buddy cop movie starring a rabbit and a fox, the majority of the film serves to act as an allegory for real world issues, particularly racism. In Zootopia, animals (specifically mammals) have given up their primal ways in order to live together in harmony. This seems nice at first, but it turns out many of the animals haven't quite put their days in the wild behind them. A lot of prey (rabbits, sheep, or whatever) still feel uneasy about the predators that once hunted them in the jungle. As a result, the predators, who are the minority in the film, often come across prejudice that leaves them being treated unfairly. There's a building tension that finally erupts in the third act of the movie, and it all serves as a pretty obvious metaphor for the way minorities, specifically the black community, is treated in America.
The movie is clearly trying to show that racial (or in this case, speciesial? special?) profiling is wrong and that it has serious negative consequences not just for individuals but for society at large. However, as Devin Faraci points out in his review, the portrayal of minorities as "predators" seems to undermine the entire message of the movie. It implies that this minority is inherently dangerous; to quote Faraci:
To be fair, the movie tries to show that the belief of a group being biologically violent is wrong. After a series of attacks from predators that have gone savage, the main character, rabbit-cop Judy Hopps, says in a press conference that there may be something in the predators' DNA that is making them resort to their primal, deadly instincts. The movie shows that this mindset is extremely harmful: Judy's fox friend Nick Wilde is really hurt by her narrow-minded remarks, and the city bursts into civil unrest as prey, afraid of the "savage" predators, riot and try to take away the predators' freedom. But here's the thing: logically, Judy wasn't wrong. The movie tells us that predators did kill prey in the past, that they did have this biological drive to kill. The characters in the movie may insist that fearing the predators is wrong, but in the end these are PREDATORS, animals that evolved in order to kill and consume prey. The prey have a totally legitimate reason to be afraid of them.
So what, is there a pro-racist message beneath this anti-racist message beneath this children's film about animals that wear pants? Not quite. Faraci claims that the movie just gets its metaphors confused, but I think it goes a little deeper than that. I think this movie wanted to present the mindset of racism so that it could break down the forms of reasoning that allow for these kinds of prejudice. Plenty of films have had the message of "prejudice is bad," but few have accurately shown how prejudice forms, how it is defended, and most importantly, how to pull apart prejudiced arguments so that the narrow-minded can think a little more openly. Through the use of animal allegory, Zootopia is trying to build up and then break down racist mentalities. The problem is, if you look at the movie hard enough, it mostly fails at the latter. The movie purposefully presents the idea that predators are biologically and historically dangerous, but when it comes time to pull the rug out from under that assertion, the rug gets stuck.
On top of that, the movie tries to push this message of "you can be whatever you want, regardless of your origins" by asserting that the characters should be judged based on their personalities and assets rather than their species. But as Faraci points out:
For those who haven't herd (get it?), Disney's latest installment Zootopia has been a huge success, grossing nearly $300 million so far and receiving an astonishing 99% Fresh Rating on Rotten Tomatoes. Being praised by many as one of the best Disney films in decades and even as one of the best police movies in years (yeah, a Disney movie about anthropomorphic animals. Go figure), Zootopia is definitely going to be in the running for Best Animated Feature at next year's Oscars. There are a lot of things about this movie that have made it so well received - including fantastic writing, beautiful animation, and spot-on voice acting - but the factor that most critics have focused on is the movie's underlying message about racial equality.
Evidenced here where the word "cute" is equated to a racial slur.
See, while Zootopia may appear to be a buddy cop movie starring a rabbit and a fox, the majority of the film serves to act as an allegory for real world issues, particularly racism. In Zootopia, animals (specifically mammals) have given up their primal ways in order to live together in harmony. This seems nice at first, but it turns out many of the animals haven't quite put their days in the wild behind them. A lot of prey (rabbits, sheep, or whatever) still feel uneasy about the predators that once hunted them in the jungle. As a result, the predators, who are the minority in the film, often come across prejudice that leaves them being treated unfairly. There's a building tension that finally erupts in the third act of the movie, and it all serves as a pretty obvious metaphor for the way minorities, specifically the black community, is treated in America.
"Predators eat prey. This is their relationship, and we in the audience understand it as such. Yes, the bunny should be pulling her kids away from the tiger. The tiger is demonstrably, historically dangerous. He has evolved to be dangerous to her."
This is the scene he's referring to. |
So what, is there a pro-racist message beneath this anti-racist message beneath this children's film about animals that wear pants? Not quite. Faraci claims that the movie just gets its metaphors confused, but I think it goes a little deeper than that. I think this movie wanted to present the mindset of racism so that it could break down the forms of reasoning that allow for these kinds of prejudice. Plenty of films have had the message of "prejudice is bad," but few have accurately shown how prejudice forms, how it is defended, and most importantly, how to pull apart prejudiced arguments so that the narrow-minded can think a little more openly. Through the use of animal allegory, Zootopia is trying to build up and then break down racist mentalities. The problem is, if you look at the movie hard enough, it mostly fails at the latter. The movie purposefully presents the idea that predators are biologically and historically dangerous, but when it comes time to pull the rug out from under that assertion, the rug gets stuck.
Here's a leaked image from the sequel. |
"...every single animal behaves either in stereotypical ways for their species (ie, the population of Bunny Boro is ever escalating by the second or wolves are dumb pack animals who howl uncontrollably or sheep are meek) or makes jokes about how they are not like their stereotypical images (an elephant with a bad memory)."A lot of these stereotypes are just played for laughs, but they're still stereotypes in a movie that is trying to break down stereotypes. It's so frustrating to see a complex and deep scene like when Nick Wilde explains that he only conforms to the "sly fox" persona because that's all society expects of him immediately followed by a joke about how wolves are pack-minded simpletons who will break out into howling fits. While the movie is just trying to get some laughs out of its setup of an animal-controlled world, it still weakens the message of "don't judge based on race/species." It doesn't completely undercut itself, but it does leave the movie on less stable footing.
This scene, while hilarious, represents this problem pretty well.
All of that said, I still think this is an important movie for people to go and watch. The movie hides its weak metaphors to the best of its ability, and it does attempt to present a really important message on a more extensive level than I think has ever been done in a family film. I don't think most kids will analyze the movie enough to work out the flawed logic of the film's arguments. On top of that, the movie is really good. The story is compelling, and while there are more references than I'd like, most of the humor stands up well on its own. The characters are charming and memorable and the animation is clean and fun. It's a good movie, as is to be expected of Disney, but people do need to stop and think about the underlying messages, and the ones that may be underlying those. This movie is well-intentioned and ambitious, but that doesn't mean it's free from crucial flaws.
Sunday, August 30, 2015
Kim Possible Review
CATEGORY: TV SHOW
RATING: TV-G
OVERVIEW: Kim Possible is an animated series that aired on Disney Channel from June 7, 2002 to September 7, 2007. The show is centered around title character Kim Possible, a teenage girl who fights crime. She's assisted by her best friend/sidekick Ron Stoppable, a goofy klutz who mostly serves as comedy relief, and Rufus, Ron's pet naked mole rat.
Kim's adventures lead the team across the world and pit them against a variety of enemies, most notably Dr. Drakken, a mad scientist trying to take over the world, and Drakken's snarky assistant Shego.
Kim and team frequently save the world from ridiculous plots, all while going to high school and dealing with typical teenage problems.
REVIEW: This show does a really good job of simultaneously parodying and paying homage to the super-spy genre. The over-the-top plots allow for ludicrous circumstances that let the comedy come naturally, while still allowing for impressively animated action and even some genuine drama.
The teenage dilemmas,while a bit cliched, never feel too forced and usually result in a decent lesson for kids. Unlike most shows that do the whole hero/teen angle, Kim Possible allows it's eponymic character to be acknowledged by her peers. That is, Kim Possible doesn't have a secret identity: she's just Kim Possible, and everyone who knows her knows what she does. This makes for an interesting angle where everyone knows what she does, but aside from people she helps directly, she doesn't receive much extra attention. For the most part, nobody really freaks out that somebody who frequently stops world dominating madmen is just sitting with them in their biology class.
Though a few characters are a bit stereotypical, most of them hold up fairly well. Kim's a competitive perfectionist who's also a big goody-goody, while Ron's the goofball slacker who, while generally good-hearted, is easily influenced and has to constantly learn a lesson, which sets up the plot for several episodes. Their relationship is odd yet believable, with Kim keeping Ron out of trouble and Ron keeping Kim from over-stressing.
Drakken and Shego are particularly great: Drakken is an egotistical maniac who constantly fails, while Shego, who is considerably more competent, constantly mocks him with no regard to his position as her boss. The two have some of the funniest moments in the series, and their relationship gains complexity from the hard to explain bond between them that keeps Shego from just leaving Drakken or Drakken from just firing Shego.
This show is genuinely funny and the comedy still holds up a decade later. A lot of this comes from the good chemistry between the characters, and the rest comes from pretty genius joke writing. I found myself laughing out loud not at individual jokes but entire episodes just because of how well-done the comedy is. There are, of course, a few jokes that fall flat, but they're extremely rare and the good jokes more than make up for them.
The only real problem I have with this series is its mixed relationship with stereotypes. For example, it's great to have a show with a strong female lead and lots of strong female characters, but it's kind of upsetting that every female in the show, except those played for laughs, have the body type of a Barbie Doll. Or how Kim is strong and smart but is constantly worried about getting a boyfriend. It's like for every ten progressive thoughts the show sponsors, there is one narrow-minded or poorly executed thought that makes the show seem cliched. In addition, sometimes messages that are supposed to be progressive and open-minded just seem forced. There are a handful of episodes where characters disregard Kim because she's "just a girl" and she has to prove herself. These are fortunately few and far between, but it bothers me that the show feels it needs to go out of its way to have "girl power" episodes. The characters, especially the female ones, are strong and well-written already; they don't need to force the idea that these characters are cool.
That being said, I don't think the show really encourages any kind of negative behavior or mindsets, at least not intentionally. Younger viewers that might be more easily influenced can still watch it safely, and probably be better off for it.
Overall, Kim Possible manages to be incredibly funny and tell a fairly engaging story while doing so. The characters hold up well and provide lots of laughs, and although there are a few morally confused concepts presented, they are few and far outnumbered by good lessons and good morals, making this show fun for all ages.
AGE RATING: As I've said, this show is OK for viewers of any age. That said, the show can be pretty action heavy, and a lot of the high school drama will only be relatable to kids around that age. I'd say anybody over the age of 10 or 11 can enjoy this show fully.
VERDICT: Similar to Danny Phantom, this show had a weird ending. Instead of building up the main villains and having a huge plot revolving around them, a totally new and unexpected threat (aliens... literally aliens) emerges that forces the heroes and villains to unite. Unlike Danny Phantom, the finale mostly manages to capture the spirit of show, although some characters feel a little out of character just so that they can get a "happy" ending.
This ending probably feels weird because the final season was only aired due to fan demand. The series was actually supposed to end with the TV movie "So the Drama," with Kim and Ron still in high school. However, the finale puts Kim and Ron at their graduation day, and it leaves their future pretty open to the viewer's imagination. I would say that a follow-up series would be absolutely doable: the show never lost its stride, not even in its later seasons. It was funny and engaging right up to the end, and I feel like there was still a lot to explore with the characters and the world they inhabit. A sequel series with Kim and Ron in college would probably work really well, although if the series stays dead it'll be fine as it is. There's a lot to enjoy already and I'm sure I'll go back and rewatch in the future; I just think a follow-up could be very successful.
SCORE: 8/10 (Great)
VERDICT: Revive/Rest in Peace
RATING: TV-G
OVERVIEW: Kim Possible is an animated series that aired on Disney Channel from June 7, 2002 to September 7, 2007. The show is centered around title character Kim Possible, a teenage girl who fights crime. She's assisted by her best friend/sidekick Ron Stoppable, a goofy klutz who mostly serves as comedy relief, and Rufus, Ron's pet naked mole rat.
Team Possible. They can do anything. |
We're evil. Gonna have to deal with it. |
REVIEW: This show does a really good job of simultaneously parodying and paying homage to the super-spy genre. The over-the-top plots allow for ludicrous circumstances that let the comedy come naturally, while still allowing for impressively animated action and even some genuine drama.
Also, laser hands. |
Also, Kim's parents seem way too OK with her just going out and fighting hoards of super-villains wielding incredibly dangerous technology. |
This pic of young Kim and Ron basically sums up their whole relationship. |
Ouch. |
The only real problem I have with this series is its mixed relationship with stereotypes. For example, it's great to have a show with a strong female lead and lots of strong female characters, but it's kind of upsetting that every female in the show, except those played for laughs, have the body type of a Barbie Doll. Or how Kim is strong and smart but is constantly worried about getting a boyfriend. It's like for every ten progressive thoughts the show sponsors, there is one narrow-minded or poorly executed thought that makes the show seem cliched. In addition, sometimes messages that are supposed to be progressive and open-minded just seem forced. There are a handful of episodes where characters disregard Kim because she's "just a girl" and she has to prove herself. These are fortunately few and far between, but it bothers me that the show feels it needs to go out of its way to have "girl power" episodes. The characters, especially the female ones, are strong and well-written already; they don't need to force the idea that these characters are cool.
Come on, writers! You were so close to being perfect! |
Although they may be left confused about proper hand care. HOW IS SHE FILING HER NAILS THROUGH A GLOVE?!? |
AGE RATING: As I've said, this show is OK for viewers of any age. That said, the show can be pretty action heavy, and a lot of the high school drama will only be relatable to kids around that age. I'd say anybody over the age of 10 or 11 can enjoy this show fully.
VERDICT: Similar to Danny Phantom, this show had a weird ending. Instead of building up the main villains and having a huge plot revolving around them, a totally new and unexpected threat (aliens... literally aliens) emerges that forces the heroes and villains to unite. Unlike Danny Phantom, the finale mostly manages to capture the spirit of show, although some characters feel a little out of character just so that they can get a "happy" ending.
Plus, Ron practically goes super saiyan. |
SCORE: 8/10 (Great)
VERDICT: Revive/Rest in Peace
Friday, April 3, 2015
The Avengers: Earth's Mightiest Heroes Review
CATEGORY: TV SHOW
RATING: TV-Y7
OVERVIEW: The Avengers: Earth's Mightiest Heroes is an animated series that ran on Disney XD from September 2, 2010 to May 5, 2013. The show is based on the Marvel comic "The Avengers" and features many of the series' primary characters, including Iron Man, Thor, Captain America, the Hulk, Black Panther, Wasp, and Ant-Man. These heroes come together to face a threat too great for any one hero to overcome alone and form a team dedicated to avenging the wrongs caused by the forces of evil.
REVIEW: It's kind of important to understand the context in which this show premiered. The Marvel Cinematic Universe was still fairly new and The Avengers movie had just recently been announced. The timing kind of made it feel like this series only existed to build up hype for the movie, and therefore wouldn't have as much effort put into it.
So it was surprising to find that instead of a cheap money-making racket, Avengers:EMH seemed to have a level of effort and thought put into it that implied the creators wanted it to stand well on its own. The show started off with an online and later televised microseries that gave backstory and character development to the main cast, all of which built up to a rather epic series premiere that may stand amongst the best action scenes in Marvel's animated lineup.
The series continues to be pretty strong, especially throughout its first season. Story arcs tend to be fairly short (2-4 episodes), but the show had a loose yet strong underlying plot that kept it from seeming like a series of random events. The show also doesn't limit itself by trying to stay within the confines of the movie universe; the Avengers face all kinds of villains, both popular and obscure, from genetic experiments to aliens to time travelers.
The characters themselves are equally charming. They aren't forced to fit their traits from the movies and instead develop personalities that both honor their comic and movie counterparts and make them unique. You get to see a lot of sides to each character, with each one getting a few episodes dedicated primarily to them. Some of my favorite moments in the show aren't even during intense or serious scenes; it's fun just to see how all the vastly different characters interact together on a team. Speaking of which, they play really well off of each other: Tony Stark (Iron Man) and Hank Pym (Ant-Man) are both geniuses but have very different ideas of what to do with their inventions, Thor and Hulk have a strong rivalry that borders on hatred at points but is founded on a deep respect for each others' strength, Captain America and Thor both argue with Iron Man over his over-dependence on machines, and Hulk and Wasp have this cute and hilarious running gag of Hulk being grumpy and Wasp trying to make him laugh or smile.
The visuals on this show are pretty good as well. They keep the action intense while also allowing for some subtler moments, all while maintaining the comic book vibe of the source material. There are more impressive looking shows out there, but this one is still nice to look at, especially during premieres and finales.
The only major problem I have with the show is the series finale. After wrapping up one of the longest plots in the series, the show has a final episode with Galactus the World Eater coming to Earth and the Avengers having to fight him off. Galactus was only barely built up during the show, and the last episode just seemed to be a way to have the whole cast come together for one final battle rather than do anything meaningful. It's pretty underwhelming and a weak ending for a show that started out so strong, but considering how good the rest of the series is, it's easily overlooked.
Avengers:EMH manages to take concepts from its source material while still presenting something new. Both the characters and the plot are unique to series and create a version of the Marvel Universe that is as worthy a viewing as any other.
AGE RATING: There's really not anything in this series inappropriate for kids. Being based on a comic book property, there are of course going to be a lot of action scenes, but there's no blood, gore, or gratuitous violence involved. There are a few romantic sideplots, but sexual content is basically nonexistent. I'd say kids of any age could watch this, but children 5-14 would probably get the most entertainment out of it.
VERDICT: I'm kind of cheating again (like in my Avatar review) because this series does have something of a "sequel," that being the Avengers Assemble show I mentioned earlier. The new show isn't really based on EMH, however, and instead uses only characters from the movie universe (with the addition of Falcon) in the main lineup.
I won't speak much about what I think of the new series since it might appear as another Sequel Success, but the two shows are distinctly different enough that I would consider Assemble to be more of a remake of EMH than a sequel. So that said, I would love to see Marvel bring back EMH as its own standalone series, maybe after Assemble ends. It was a unique take on the Marvel Universe that I felt still had a lot more to offer.
SCORE: 8/10 (Great)
VERDICT: Revive
RATING: TV-Y7
OVERVIEW: The Avengers: Earth's Mightiest Heroes is an animated series that ran on Disney XD from September 2, 2010 to May 5, 2013. The show is based on the Marvel comic "The Avengers" and features many of the series' primary characters, including Iron Man, Thor, Captain America, the Hulk, Black Panther, Wasp, and Ant-Man. These heroes come together to face a threat too great for any one hero to overcome alone and form a team dedicated to avenging the wrongs caused by the forces of evil.
"Yeah Wasp, I'm sure your ability to shrink and cause mildly irritating stings will be enough to take down the 50-foot tall energy monster." |
A thought supported by its replacement shortly after the release of The Avengers. The new series, Avengers Assemble, is more closely based on the movie universe. |
And of course, the Helicarrier goes down. |
"Look out! A wad of cookie dough has gained sentience!" |
"So the duck says, 'Put it on my bill!'" "HAHAHA! HULK LIKE STUPID DUCK!" |
I whip my Thor back and forth. I whip my Thor back and forth. |
One of the greatest threats in the Marvel Universe? Yeah, I think we can do him justice in the span of 22 minutes. |
AGE RATING: There's really not anything in this series inappropriate for kids. Being based on a comic book property, there are of course going to be a lot of action scenes, but there's no blood, gore, or gratuitous violence involved. There are a few romantic sideplots, but sexual content is basically nonexistent. I'd say kids of any age could watch this, but children 5-14 would probably get the most entertainment out of it.
VERDICT: I'm kind of cheating again (like in my Avatar review) because this series does have something of a "sequel," that being the Avengers Assemble show I mentioned earlier. The new show isn't really based on EMH, however, and instead uses only characters from the movie universe (with the addition of Falcon) in the main lineup.
"Whatever happened to Wasp?" "The studio realized she was interesting and relatable and decided that was too high a standard to maintain." |
Perhaps they could add the most powerful Marvel character to their roster: Squirrel Girl. That's not even a joke. Squirrel Girl took down Thanos, who's basically Galactus on steroids. |
VERDICT: Revive
Featured on OddQuail
My original blog post, the review of Avatar, has been featured on OddQuail! You can find my review in the community section. Also check out their other material while you're there.
http://oddquail.wix.com/oddquail
http://oddquail.wix.com/oddquail
Saturday, February 21, 2015
Sequel Showdown: A:TLA vs. LoK
This review will be different than the others. In Sequel Showdown, I
look at an original movie or television series and then compare it to its sequel,
deciding whether the sequel was successful in keeping the original's
spirit alive while also adding in new elements of its own. I'll also
decide which of the two is better, which will be displayed at the bottom
of the review. Without further introduction, here's the first Sequel
Showdown, Avatar: The Last Airbender vs. The Legend of Korra.
THE ORIGINAL: Avatar: The Last Airbender
RATING: TV-Y7
DATES RUN: 2005-2008
SYNOPSIS: Four nations, each focused around one of
the natural elements (earth, water, fire, air) exist in a world in which
people called "benders" can manipulate said elements. They live in
peace until the Fire Nation attacks the others, starting a massive world
war.
The only person powerful enough to end the war, a
being who can bend all four elements called the Avatar, goes missing
just prior to the war, leaving no one to stop the Fire Nation. Since the
Avatar is reincarnated into the next nation in the cycle (water, earth,
fire, then air), the Fire Nation eliminates the Air Nomads so that the
next Avatar wouldn't be born and the cycle would be broken, meaning no
Avatar would ever return to defeat the Fire Nation.
A hundred years pass, and two members of the Southern
Water Tribe discover a young boy in an iceberg who can airbend, making
him the last airbender and, as luck would have it, the Avatar.
REVIEW: I've already said as much as I can say about Avatar in my first review without giving away any spoilers. The traditional Asian themes of the setting mixed with extensive and engaging mythology give the show an aura of legend. All the characters are an absolute joy to witness and their characters are fleshed out to the best of the writers' abilities, which is really damn good. The episodic nature of the show makes the journey feel lengthy in a good way, like the characters are on this grand adventure, all while progressing an overarching plot that, while fairly straight forward, provides the necessary obstacles to see these characters at their worst and best. The show looks and sounds fantastic, with the movements for bending being based on actual martial arts and the elements moving just like you'd think they would. Avatar is fun, it's creative, the characters are wonderful, the lore is fantastic... it's one of my favorite shows and it probably will continue to be long into the future.
THE SEQUEL: The Legend of Korra
RATING: TV-Y7
DATES RUN: 2012-2014
SYNOPSIS: Korra begins several decades after the
events of Avatar. The war against the Fire Nation is over and the
nations have returned to peace. Aang and his friends have created a new
nation called the United Republic which has become a central hub of
world culture. Aang dies at some point between the two shows, and a new
Avatar named Korra is born into the Southern Water Tribe.
Despite being very skilled at bending, Korra is kept
at the south pole well into her teens by her guardians known as the
White Lotus. When she learns that her airbending teaching from Aang's
son, Tenzin, is going to be delayed, Korra sneaks onto a boat heading
for Republic City, the capital of the United Republic and Tenzin's home,
so that she can learn airbending and finally see the world outside her
home. Despite a rough first encounter with city life, she gets to stay
and train with Tenzin while also learning what it means to be the
Avatar.
REVIEW: Korra takes the Avatar franchise in a different direction. Instead of self-contained episodes with their own stories contributing to a large, overarching plot for the whole series, Korra episodes are primarily focused on the story of the season, with each season having its own plot that may or may not have a major impact on the seasons that follow. The first season is focused on a group of non-benders called the Equalists who want to eliminate bending so everyone will be equal. The second season focuses on a rise in aggressive spirit activity that's threatening the world. The third season focuses on the return of the Air Nomads and how such a huge change impacts the world. The fourth and final season deals with the rebuilding of the Earth Kingdom after the events of the third season.
This kind of structure makes the show feel more like a
series of challenges to be dealt with rather than the kind of grand
adventure presented in Avatar. That means there's less of a focus on
character and more of a focus on story - the characters have to react to
their situation rather than do what they want, making the show more
serious than Avatar.
The show also takes advantage of the time skip
between the series; while Avatar felt primarily like it was set in the
distant past, with a few bizarrely modern machines spread about, Korra
takes place in a world similar to the early 20th century, with cars,
skyscrapers, and other modern day technology and designs, all while
still holding onto those traditional Asian themes.
There's also a distinct shift in focus on the kind of
opposition the characters face. In Avatar, the bad guys were pretty
obviously bad, just wanting to take over the world because they were a bunch of jerks. This kind of evil does occur in the real world
(the Holocaust, for example), but it's not terribly justifiable. In Korra, the bad guys had, for the most part, reasonable
complaints about the world and just ended up choosing the wrong way of
fixing their problems. For example, the Equalists want to make
non-benders equal to benders, and so they decide that the best way of
doing that is by getting rid of bending. This makes the villains more
sympathetic and gives the good guys more reason to doubt their own
cause, creating more drama in the story.
This works well for LoK, because the real focus is on
the story rather than the characters, making the villains' intents more
important than they were in the more laid back A:TLA. With all of that
said, LoK still has strong characters that are thoroughly analyzed.
They're still a lot of fun to watch, and the show doesn't become so
serious as to become boring. The visuals have only gotten better since
A:TLA, making action sequences all that much more intense and the
setting all that much more beautiful. It's still a fun and engaging show
that moves the Avatar franchise in a new direction while maintaining
the traits that made it great in the first place.
VS.
[I usually try to keep my reviews as spoiler free as possible, but there will be MAJOR SPOILERS ahead in the following sections]
I'll be breaking up the comparison between the two shows into seven categories: plot, action, romance, villains, side characters, Team Avatar, and protagonist. Each category is worth one point, and the show with the most points that the end is the one I consider the better show.
PLOT: I've already discussed the
differences between the plot structure when talking about Korra, so now
I'll go over them in more detail. The structure for both really works in
each one's favor; Avatar's overarching storyline with a stronger focus
on individual episodes makes the original series feel more like a
timeless epic, while Korra's story-driven episodes that drive forth the
plot of each season makes the second series feel like a string of
disastrous events that the characters have to deal with, which fits the
theme of change that's spread throughout the majority of LoK. Both
structures have their strengths and weaknesses - Avatar is a bit more
simplistic and could be considered more "kiddy" or "filler-ish" due to
its more laid back approach, while Korra's constant barrage of plot
advancement leaves less room to enjoy the characters or the comedy.
That said, I believe Korra has the stronger plotline
of the two. While Avatar is a timeless tale, its plot is very simple and
we've seen it a lot before - bad guys want to take over the world, good
guys have to stop them. There's nothing necessarily thought-provoking
about the plot itself; most of the thought-provoking moments come from
seeing how the characters have to deal with their problems, not the
problems themselves. With Korra, things get more complicated. The
motives of the villains aren't entirely evil, and in some cases are
possibly good, such as Amon's dream of equality or Kuvira's dream of a
united Earth Kingdom. In addition, Korra's plot did better at tying
together the struggle of the main storyline with the setting. In Avatar,
the heroes would go to a town, help them out, and then leave,
everything being fixed; this added to the sense that they were on an
adventure, but it didn't make it seem like their ultimate goal, stopping
the Fire Nation from taking over the world, was such a big deal until
each season's climax. In Korra, you see innocent people being oppressed
or attacked as a direct result of the story's antagonist; Amon began
taking away bender's powers, Unalaq took over the Southern Water Tribe,
Zaheer sent the Earth Kingdom into chaos, and Kuvira conquered and
enslaved thousands in her quest for power. This gives the heroes more
motivation to overcome the challenges presented to them, and it gives
the audience more of a reason to care about the outcome. In Avatar, we
wanted to see the hero succeed because we liked the hero, but in Korra,
we wanted to see the hero succeed because we understood the consequences
of failure.
Winner: Korra
ACTION: I mentioned earlier that
the visuals in Korra have improved over that of Avatar, so this category
should be pretty straight forward. Better animation and art style
automatically mean better fight scenes, right? Well, this one's a little
more complicated than that. First of all, the animation in Avatar is
already spectacular; the gap between the two shows is not that big.
Second, while Korra may have some smoother, cleaner animation, there's a
huge difference between the scale of the action in the two series.
For whatever reason (maybe the more modern, urban
setting the show has), Korra's action is usually pretty small scale.
Bending is usually used to take down a single opponent at a time, with
of course exceptions during massive battles and season finales. This
makes fights more personal, but it doesn't feel like the characters are
very powerful, instead just very skilled. The battles are still
impressive, but the characters, heroes and villains alike, seem to be
above average rather than in their own league.
Compare this to Avatar, where there are multiple
times that the characters use bending to do things that seem impossible,
like when Aang stopped a volcano from destroying a village, or when we
see a flashback of Kyoshi tearing a peninsula off the mainland and
making her own island, or when Toph keeps a massive building from
sinking into the desert long enough for Team Avatar to escape. Korra has
a few similarly large action scenes, like when Korra fights a massive
Vaatu in her spirit form at the end of season two or the spirit vine
weapons used in season four, but Avatar is constantly showing the
characters performing feats that defy imagination.
Also, since Avatar came first, the limitations on
what bending could do were still unexplored. Anything was possible, and
we were amazed when we saw the characters using new abilities like
blood-bending or metal-bending. In Korra, we've had an entire series
prior to understand how bending works, so there's less awe at what the
characters can accomplish, especially when the scale of the action is
turned down (although there are still awesome scenes like lava-bending).
When you tie in the massive scope of action in the original with
Avatar's sense of grand adventure and epic fantasy, it doesn't just feel
like you're watching people skilled with a force that exists in their
world; it feels like your seeing legends perform acts of mythical
proportions, doing things no person should be capable of. Korra may have
some really cool visuals, but Avatar just ties in the action to the
show's tone perfectly.
Winner: Avatar
ROMANCE: This has always been this franchise's weakest point. The love side plots in these shows aren't necessarily bad (except season one of Korra. Yikes.), but they're nothing particularly moving either. In Avatar, Aang has a crush on Katara that ultimately leads to them getting together at the end of the series, but it's kind of hard to get behind. Katara is already established as a sort of older sister/ mother figure to Aang, and it's hard for us as an audience to imagine how that relationship would change into something romantic.
Other than that, there aren't too many other romantic
subplots in the first Avatar. Katara has a crush on a boy named Jet at
one point but she gets over him in the same episode and the two only
interact one other time several episodes later. There's this constant
theme of Sokka being seen as attractive to various side characters and
even some of the main ones, but he only really gets with Yue, a Water
Tribe princess who takes the place of the moon spirit in season one, and
Suki, a warrior who teaches him that girls can fight, too. The former
is sort of tragic but the relationship only existed for three episodes
and wasn't established on much other than good looks and humor, while
the second is a kind of cute relationship that isn't very deep but isn't
especially annoying.
There's only one other romance I can think of and
that's between Zuko and a stoic girl named Mai. Again, this relationship
isn't built on much (other than they're both always miserable), but it
does have its touching moments when Zuko has to betray Mai when he
deserts the Fire Nation.
Meanwhile, Korra has a pretty weak love triangle between Bolin, Mako, and Korra that changes to Mako, Asami, and Korra later on. While there are some funny moments from this, the chemistry between the characters is almost nonexistent and the writers had the good sense to cut Mako and Korra's relationship off by the end of the second season, leaving all of the characters mentioned before single.
Korra is left out of any other explicit relationships
for the rest of the series, although there is a fan-theorized
relationship between her and Asami that is very heavily implied to be
canon at the end of the series [EDIT: the creators have confirmed Korrasami to be canon]. Although I'm not against the
relationship, especially considering how progressive it is for
children's television and how the pair developed a strong friendship
through the latter part of the series that could reasonably evolve into
something more, I personally felt the conclusion to their love subplot
was rushed and a bit too fanservicey. It all happens within the last two
minutes of the final episode and the dialogue between the two was just
so awkward and out of nowhere that it feels kind of forced. The imagery
and music are nice, but the lead-up to that final shot is just so
jarring it leaves you with the sense that it was shoved in last second
to wrap up loose ends.
That said, there were some more interesting romances
throughout the series. Although it received little attention in later
seasons, the former romance between Tenzin - Aang's son - and Lin -
Toph's daughter - ended in them breaking up prior to the show and Tenzin
starting a family with another woman named Pema, which results in the
two having a strained relationship for years. Lin and Tenzin have to
work through their problems and ultimately Lin sacrifices herself to
save the family of her ex-boyfriend. It's a touching subplot that is
sadly looked over the rest of the series.
While we're talking about Tenzin, his relationship
with Pema is also fairly strong. While we don't see the two alone very
often, you do get to see Tenzin with his family a lot, and you can
see how Pema acts as the gentler, kinder half to his serious
disposition. It's rare, but you'll occasionally get a glimpse of the
two's relationship as a couple; Pema tends to be Tenzin's emotional
support and guidance in times when his serious and less intimate
personality can't solve the problems he has to face. You can see
the connection between them, especially when you see the whole family
together.
Other relationships include a cute love between Bolin and Toph's granddaughter, Opal. The two have a similar relationship to Sokka and Suki, with Bolin being the silly doofus that Opal is both embarrassed and charmed by. There's also a hilarious relationship between Bolin and a Water Tribe princess named Eska, but I won't say much about it because it's mostly played for laughs.
There are a few other romances throughout Korra as
well; the writers seemed more interested in pushing it in this series,
perhaps due to the older age of the characters and target audience. So
that leaves the question of which series did better: Avatar, which had a
few nice, safe relationships that weren't terribly interesting but were
charming enough, or Korra, which took a bolder stance on romance but
had several rough patches because of it. Personally, I feel Korra's
romances are stronger just because there are so many good ones to go
along with the bad ones. And the only real bad romance was the one
between Mako and Korra; the only reason it holds so much weight is
because it lasted two seasons. That said, Korra took chances that paid
off most of the time, and that puts it just ahead.
Winner: Korra
VILLAINS: This seems like another easy win for Korra since I mentioned earlier that the villains' motives in Korra are more relatable than those of Avatar. But motive alone doesn't make a good villain, and a lot of times it's better to have a villain who's more intimidating than identifiable.
Let's start with Korra. Each season Korra faced a new
villain, and her first was Amon, the leader of the Equalists. While
Amon's motives had credibility, he wasn't a character played up for
sympathy. From his expressionless mask to his incredible combat skill,
Amon was meant to be intimidating in a cold, calculating way. You didn't
know what he looked like under the mask until the end of the season,
and that was fine, because he was less individual than he was an ideal
given human form. He was a memorable villain who was given a tragic
ending when his plans fell apart.
Next came Unalaq and Vaatu, the villains of season
two. These two were probably the weakest of the series' villains, with
Unalaq being a religious nut who was more power hungry than he was
motivated by his supposed goal of bringing the spirits back, and Vaatu
being an ancient evil that we've seen a thousand times before and
honestly wasn't very intimidating in design (evil kite? Really?). They
had an interesting fight sequence at the end of the season, but they
honestly weren't very memorable. They were more impressive for what they
accomplished - temporarily destroying the Avatar spirit and permanently
cutting off Korra's connection to her past lives - than for who they
were.
In the third season we see Zaheer and his gang of
anarchists who call themselves the Red Lotus. They want to remove the
world leaders from power to attain true freedom, and they plan on
permanently destroying the Avatar in order to do so. This is the first
time we really see an evil "team," and the villains in this season all
have some really cool designs and powers. That said, they didn't really
get fleshed out as they needed to be, which is a shame because they
seemed to have some very interesting backstories and personalities we'll
never fully understand. Zaheer himself is sort of the calm and
collected figure with a demeanor that kind of betrays his darker
purpose, which is to bring chaos upon the world. The disconnection
between his personality and his motive is slightly jarring, but that may
just make him a bit more interesting rather than work against him.
Finally we have Kuvira, who tries to unite the
shattered Earth Kingdom in the wake of season three's events. Kuvira is
perhaps the most reasonable of the villains; in her first appearance in
season three, she's actually one of the good guys, and she doesn't
explicitly become a villain until a few episodes into the final season.
Despite often having a stoic and cold attitude, she acts somewhat as
Korra's double; both are aggressive and refuse to back down, doing
whatever they have to do to maintain order. This makes her possibly the
best of the series' villains, as she's not only relatable due to her
motives but also her personality similarities with the protagonist.
Did you notice a pattern amongst Korra's villains?
All were cold, calculating strategists that had an underlying ferocity
to them that made them intimidating. While they work fine as
individuals, seeing them all lined up together kind of makes them seem
unoriginal. While I like Kuvira best in hindsight, when I first saw her I
thought, "Oh look. Another calm, collected strategist who does terrible
things with their superior skill and intellect. Where have I seen that
before?" There isn't much diversity in personality here; there's enough
so that the villains aren't boring, but not enough for them to really
stand apart from each other except in their motivation.
Moving on to Avatar, we have a few less major
villains to choose from, and unlike in Korra, all of them are working
together for the same cause. For starters, we have the Fire Lord
himself, Ozai. This character was only shown in shadow for the first two
seasons of the series, really building up his evilness and badassery.
Yet when we finally see his face, we don't see some terrible monster,
but rather a normal and even handsome man. He doesn't necessarily look
evil (in fact, in another story his appearance might make him a good
guy), and that's what's so great about his design: it shows that anyone
is capable of evil and madness, regardless of however normal they may
appear. During the series finale he commits unspeakable atrocities,
really sending home the message his appearance sends.
Although Ozai gets plenty of buildup, he falls behind
in motivation, backstory, and personality. He's mostly just the final
boss, one last great foe for the hero to overcome. That's not
necessarily bad, but it doesn't make him that great, either.
Fortunately, we have another terrifying villain to make up for her
father's shortcomings, and that's the princess of the Fire Nation,
Azula. Whereas Ozai was built up over the three seasons and was
something of a letdown, Azula came out of nowhere and immediately
grabbed our attention. She's a tyrant who demands absolute perfection
from not only those around her but also herself. She has the cold,
calculating personality that a lot of the Korra characters I mentioned
earlier have, but she's only half their age and is easily the best
strategist in the entire series. She'll destroy anyone who opposes her
without so much as a second thought and is constantly manipulating both
friend and foe alike. She's the perfect villain, so evil you can't help
but hate her, and her final battle is both fulfilling and heartbreaking
to watch as you see someone who was always in control finally slip into
madness, realizing that everything she fought for and plotted to achieve wasn't enough to
make her happy.
So Avatar has one less-than-amazing villain and one
outstanding villain. Is that enough for it to win over Korra's three
really good villains and one bad one? Fortunately, that's not a question
I have to answer, because Avatar has one more villain that will settle
the matter without dispute, and that character is Zuko.
I count Zuko as a villain because, for the majority
of the series, he acted as an antagonist to the heroes. But even from
the beginning, we could tell Zuko wasn't evil. He was desperate, as
capturing the Avatar was his only chance at restoring the honor he lost
to his father. Zuko's back story is so tragic that you almost want him
to catch Aang just so he can finally win at something. He acts as a
parallel to Aang; both shamed themselves and have to restore their
honor, although in Zuko's case, he was actually shamed for doing
something noble and tried to redeem himself by doing something wrong,
while Aang acted selfishly and has to make up for it by putting the
needs of others above himself. Zuko is a character who is constantly
struggling to understand what is right and wrong in the world, and he
ultimately realizes that the thing he wanted, his honor, was not
something he could gain by doing the bidding of his evil father. He
realized that honor is something one gains for themselves; it can't be
given by someone else. He ultimately redeems himself by joining the
heroes and fighting the Fire Nation so that he can end the war and
regain not only his own honor, but the honor of his nation. His is one
of the greatest redemption stories I've ever seen.
With Zuko added in, the scales tip in Avatar's favor.
Korra may have some relatable villains, but they just can't compare to
the terror, tragedy, and all around awesomeness of the Fire Nation's
royal family.
Winner: Avatar
SIDE CHARACTERS: A lot of fake-out gimmes in this review. This time, you'd think that I'd give the win to Avatar since I've talked about how it's more character-driven than Korra. However, the episodic nature of Avatar means that characters that aren't directly associated with the main team rarely make appearances. Don't get me wrong, there are a lot of good characters outside of Team Avatar: you've got the wacky King Bumi, the beautiful but deadly Kyoshi warrior Suki, Azula's lackeys Mai and Ty Lee, and most notable of all, the wise and lovable Uncle Iroh.
I'm going to focus on Iroh because honestly, he could
win this category all by himself. Iroh is the perfect superman figure;
despite having no major character flaws and being a totally incredible
fighter, Iroh manages not to seem over-powered and is one of the most
interesting and likable characters in the show. His dedication to
setting his confused and struggling nephew Zuko on the right path is
inspiring, heartwarming, and tear-jerking throughout the entire series.
He acts not only as Zuko's mentor and advisor, but also as the
antisocial and angsty teen's only friend and loved one. The bond between
Zuko and Iroh is so great that the show could have just been about them
and still managed to be incredible; he's a beacon of hope amongst a
corrupt nation and a figure that all the characters can look up to and
admire.
But as much as I absolutely adore Iroh, he stands
alone amongst a horde of other side characters. The others don't get
nearly as much screen time or exploration of character; the only ones
who come close are Mai and Ty Lee, and they're not a tenth as
interesting as Iroh. Everyone else kind of just come and go, leaving the
main team to get the majority of the focus.
Korra, on the other hand, has characters practically oozing out, and they are all good at worst and fantastic at best. You have the entire Bei Fong family who get a ton of attention in the later two seasons and have some of the most touching moments in the series, you have Korra's mentor Tenzin and his family who are absolutely adorable and heat-warming, you have hilarious characters like the Water Tribe princess Eska and the eccentric businessman Varrick... the list goes on and on and they all are just an absolute joy to watch.
Even some of the characters from the first series
return, albeit older; Katara, Toph, Zuko, and Iroh all make important
appearances during the series, helping the main characters get closer to
their goal. So even though I really, really, really love Iroh, I have to give side characters to Korra because it has just too many good characters to count.
Winner: Korra
TEAM AVATAR: Let's clarify who counts as Team Avatar. Since I've already used Zuko as a villain, I won't be counting him amongst Avatar's Gaang: that leaves Sokka, Katara, Toph, Momo, and Appa, excluding Aang since the protagonists get their own section. For the Korra Krew, there's Mako, Bolin, Asami, Naga, and Pabu.
Let's start with the Gaang. Katara and Sokka are the first to discover Aang after his hundred year imprisonment in the iceberg. Sokka is the oldest member of the Gaang and shows it by trying to be the leader, especially when it comes to making plans. He also acts as the comedy relief, which creates a unique combination where he's constantly being the butt end of jokes but is also acting as a huge asset to the team, despite his lack of bending ability. He's one of the funniest characters in the franchise and one of the most beloved.
Next is Katara, the mother figure of the group. While not as funny as many of the other characters, Katara acts as emotional support for most of the team and is the one who picks everyone up when all hope seems lost. She has possibly the strongest will of any of the team's members, making her a serious force to be reckoned with. Like any good mother figure, Katara is both nurturing to those in her care and fearsome to any who would do her loved ones harm.
The last of the Gaang's human members is Toph, the
blind earthbender with a bad attitude and the skills to back up her
smart mouth. She's an incredibly gifted bender, being the first to ever
metalbend, and on occasion you can see a glimmer of her softer side
shine through that wall of badass she's always putting off.
Lastly we have Appa and Momo, the animal companions
of the group. Appa is Aang's flying bison and oldest living friend,
giving the two a deep connection that ignores the species gap. Appa is
typically calm and laid back, happy to lazily eat while the main team
goes on their adventures, but he's gotten the team out of multiple
situations and was even kidnapped for several episodes, greatly
upsetting the team. He's also their primary source of transportation,
flying them across the world to wherever they need to go. Momo is a
flying lemur who sort of acts like a best friend to Appa; he's always
moving about, curiously observing his surroundings and being chatty, a
good contrast to the gentler Appa. The two have a lot of character
despite not having any spoken parts, and they really feel like major
assets to the team.
This moves us on to the Korra Krew. Starting off is
Mako, Bolin's older brother and Korra's love interest during the first
two seasons. Mako is sort of the stoic character who tries to be strong
by not showing much emotion. A lot of times this makes him come off as
boring, but he plays an important role by remaining level-headed when the others
are too fired up to think straight, and he certainly can show his
feelings when his friends are in danger or he's placed in a scenario he
just can't cope with. He's also fiercely loyal, having grown up on the
streets with only his brother. He's not terribly interesting early on,
but his character is more fleshed out as the show progresses and he
becomes someone the others can always trust to be there when he's
needed.
Mako's younger brother is Bolin, who acts as the
comedic relief of the team. Unlike Sokka, Bolin isn't terribly clever,
and for a long time he was sort of the weak link in the team; he could
hold his own well enough in a fight, but he had nothing to really
contribute besides jokes and earthbending. He only really becomes
valuable at the end of season three, where he masters lavabending, a
form of bending very few can accomplish. Throughout the last season we
see him mature more and try to help others in ways other than fighting,
but his attempts at being useful actually end up with him working for
the bad guys. He's not worthless; he's loyal and willing to fight even
when he's scared, which he tends to show more fear than the other
characters, making him more relatable. It's just that Bolin doesn't
really do much for the team aside from joking and fighting, especially
in earlier seasons. He's definitely likable, but he just doesn't act as much
of an asset.
That leaves Asami for the human members.
Asami was initially introduced as Mako's love interest and the third
part of the love triangle that included Korra. However, from the start
Asami has shown immense potential as a team member. She makes up for her
lack of bending by being a master in unarmed combat and a genius in
mechanics. She invents the multiple weapons, devices, and forms of
transportation the team uses, and she's always the one who knows what to
do when technology is involved. She's kind of boring personality-wise
in the earlier seasons, but later on she acts as Korra's closest
confidant, being the only real female friend Korra has ever had (and,
again, the creators seemed to be heavily implying a romantic bond
between the two). She's easily the most important team member outside of
combat and she can even hold her own pretty well when things get rough.
That only leaves Naga and Pabu, the animal friends of
the Krew. Naga is a polar bear dog who, like Appa to Aang, is Korra's
oldest friend. You see a lot of love between the two, but not quite to
the same extent that you saw between Aang and Appa; Naga seems more like
a beloved pet than a core member of the team, and the two of them can
be separated for long stretches of time without having much of an
impact. Pabu is Bolin's pet fire ferret, and he has a similar role to
Momo from Avatar. He's chattery and excited, and he and Naga have some
cute moments where they'll play together. Again, though, he doesn't feel
exactly essential to the team, and he'll be missing for long stretches
without anyone noticing.
It's pretty obvious which team wins here. Even if you
consider each member of the Krew individually equal to the members of
the Gaang, they still wouldn't win because they don't interact as a team
on the same level. You'll see Korra's team hang out occasionally, and
sometimes they'll help each other in a big battle or a finale, but
everyone usually ends up going their separate ways and doing their own
thing for the majority of each season.
In Avatar, the team is always together.
They're more than allies working towards a goal and they're more than
friends hanging out; they're a family who will do anything to protect
each other and try to help each other whenever things get tough.
Avatar's main cast just contribute more to the protagonist than Korra's
team can, and there's this sense of a bond between the Gaang that feels
genuine and deep. Korra doesn't seem as dependent upon her team as Aang
is; part of the reason is due to her tutelage and guidance from Tenzin,
who I counted amongst the side characters. Overall, the Gaang just have
more to offer the Avatar than Korra's Krew does.
Winner: Avatar
It all comes down to this. Korra won three points in plot, romance, and side characters, while Avatar won three points in action, villains, and Team Avatar. The tie breaker comes down to one final question: which series has the better protagonist?
PROTAGONIST: We'll start with the original. Aang was twelve when he ran away from the Air Temple because he couldn't deal with the pressure of being the Avatar. This act of selfishness and fear resulted in him being frozen for a hundred years while the world was plunged into war; throughout the series, Aang has to deal with the guilt he feels from having abandoned the world when it needed him most. This sense of responsibility is what drives him to fight against the Fire Nation, despite his upbringing as a peaceful monk. He's still just a kid, though, and lots of times he'll try to put aside his duties so he can just enjoy life like any normal kid would.
Throughout his journey, Aang has to accept
responsibilities far beyond those of any other person his age or anyone
else in general. He has to set aside his guilt and fears to attain the
peace of mind that will allow him to use his most powerful weapon, the
Avatar State, so that he can end the war and restore peace to the world.
Korra is very different from her predecessor. Whereas Aang tried to avoid the responsibility of being the Avatar, Korra wants to embrace it, to the point where she's cocky and prideful of the power she possesses. She finds her progress constantly being held back by those "looking out for her." She trains hard to become the best fighter she can be, but her teachers are afraid that she doesn't understand the spirituality being the Avatar requires. Once she finally gets what she wants and starts getting responsibility, she realizes that being the Avatar isn't as great as she thought, and she has to figure out what she has to do to keep the world in balance despite being a more physically-oriented and hotheaded Avatar.
Korra and Aang are polar opposites, and when it comes
to which kind of personality is better, it's all a matter of
preference. However, there is a way in which we can determine which is
the better character, and that's by how they interact with their
environment.
See, an interesting protagonist is always put into conflict with the world around him or her. This tests the character's morals and values; in Aang's case, he was a peaceful person forced into the center of a massive war, and he has to find ways to overcome his challenges without sacrificing what makes him unique. Even in his backstory, Aang was being forced to deal with situations he was not ready for: he was told he was the Avatar, and that burden sent him running from home and being absent during most of the war. He's always having to find a way to fight against the Fire Nation that keeps him from losing his most important characteristics; being a pacifist, he always tries to avoid conflict, and he never kills. It's why his part of the series finale is so intense; we see Aang overcome with the power of the Avatar State, and in his rage he may do something that will tear at his soul for the rest of his life.
She acts this way because, for the first two seasons,
violence is the answer to her problems. She may have to come up with a
strategy rather than just fight blindly, but fighting in some form is
always the solution to her problem. It isn't until season three that we
get to see her in a situation she's not suited to: the Air Nomads are
returning, and they need the Avatar to help reintegrate them into the
world. This requires Korra to learn other skills like negotiation,
compassion, understanding, and guidance. She has to learn to solve a
problem without fighting, and she only ends up fighting to protect the
things she worked so hard to establish. It's a wonderful turn in the
series when Korra finally stops being a total thug and learns the more
thoughtful and gentle skills that the Avatar needs in order to keep
peace.
Unfortunately for Korra, this transformation takes
two whole seasons to even begin. Aang began learning and growing as a
person from the first episode; Korra spends half the series punching away
her problems until she finally comes across an obstacle she can't
overcome through physical force. We get to see Aang at his highest, his
lowest, his wisest, his most foolish, his kindest, his most hateful, and
every possible aspect of his personality we could possibly want to
explore. We were just beginning to see Korra for something more than a
brute by the time her series ended. Given more time, she may have stood a
chance, but Aang just had too much of a head start for her to ever keep
up.
Winner: Avatar
CONCLUSION: These were two fantastic series that had a lot to offer. LoK made a lot of progress from its predecessor, but some unfortunate shortcomings just barely held it back from surpassing the greatness of A:TLA. A lot of the fault is on Nickelodeon; season one was originally set to be the entire series, but the popularity of the show was so high they demanded more seasons, leaving the first season largely disconnected from the others. Nick also took the show off the air and put it entirely online during season three, and then they cut the funding for the fourth season to the point where the creators had to make a clip show episode rather than develop character or progress plot. If the creators of this show can get with a company that respects their talent and experience, I would say that we'd see a show that would completely dominate anything else on television. I hope they create more Avatar-related material in the future; until then, I can always rewatch these two incredible shows.
FINAL VERDICT: Avatar: The Last Airbender is the victor, making the original better than the sequel.
THE ORIGINAL: Avatar: The Last Airbender
RATING: TV-Y7
DATES RUN: 2005-2008
"Have you read this guy's first review? We've got this in the bag." - The Gaang |
So the snacks quote from the first review might have been off... |
They were over twelve years too late, but it's the thought that counts. |
REVIEW: I've already said as much as I can say about Avatar in my first review without giving away any spoilers. The traditional Asian themes of the setting mixed with extensive and engaging mythology give the show an aura of legend. All the characters are an absolute joy to witness and their characters are fleshed out to the best of the writers' abilities, which is really damn good. The episodic nature of the show makes the journey feel lengthy in a good way, like the characters are on this grand adventure, all while progressing an overarching plot that, while fairly straight forward, provides the necessary obstacles to see these characters at their worst and best. The show looks and sounds fantastic, with the movements for bending being based on actual martial arts and the elements moving just like you'd think they would. Avatar is fun, it's creative, the characters are wonderful, the lore is fantastic... it's one of my favorite shows and it probably will continue to be long into the future.
We're so timeless we've turned sepia. |
RATING: TV-Y7
DATES RUN: 2012-2014
"Who's ready to beat some old school ass?" - Team Avatar 2.0 |
Who's *gasp* a FEMALE PROTAGON... oh wait, I did this joke already. |
REVIEW: Korra takes the Avatar franchise in a different direction. Instead of self-contained episodes with their own stories contributing to a large, overarching plot for the whole series, Korra episodes are primarily focused on the story of the season, with each season having its own plot that may or may not have a major impact on the seasons that follow. The first season is focused on a group of non-benders called the Equalists who want to eliminate bending so everyone will be equal. The second season focuses on a rise in aggressive spirit activity that's threatening the world. The third season focuses on the return of the Air Nomads and how such a huge change impacts the world. The fourth and final season deals with the rebuilding of the Earth Kingdom after the events of the third season.
Each |
with a |
badass |
villain. |
Though not always serious. |
Started from the bottom... |
...now we're here. |
"So, are you saying the mass murderer is right, or...?" |
"He said good things about us! We're going to win!" |
[I usually try to keep my reviews as spoiler free as possible, but there will be MAJOR SPOILERS ahead in the following sections]
I'll be breaking up the comparison between the two shows into seven categories: plot, action, romance, villains, side characters, Team Avatar, and protagonist. Each category is worth one point, and the show with the most points that the end is the one I consider the better show.
"You ready to go, baldy?" "Whenever you're ready, bimbo." |
"Kiddy?" |
"No comedy?" |
Winner: Korra
"WHAAAAAAAAT?!?!" |
"Crap, I was hoping this one would be a gimme." |
"You calling me weak, punk?" |
Count the shits being given (hint: whole number less than 1 but more than -1) |
Winner: Avatar
"We might be in trouble." |
ROMANCE: This has always been this franchise's weakest point. The love side plots in these shows aren't necessarily bad (except season one of Korra. Yikes.), but they're nothing particularly moving either. In Avatar, Aang has a crush on Katara that ultimately leads to them getting together at the end of the series, but it's kind of hard to get behind. Katara is already established as a sort of older sister/ mother figure to Aang, and it's hard for us as an audience to imagine how that relationship would change into something romantic.
The Dark Horse comics actually do a pretty good job of expanding their relationship, but this review is for the shows only. This pic is from The Promise. |
"You hear that, sweetie? We're not annoying!" |
Meanwhile, Korra has a pretty weak love triangle between Bolin, Mako, and Korra that changes to Mako, Asami, and Korra later on. While there are some funny moments from this, the chemistry between the characters is almost nonexistent and the writers had the good sense to cut Mako and Korra's relationship off by the end of the second season, leaving all of the characters mentioned before single.
So now everyone is alone! Yay! |
"Want to make out?" "We're at a funeral, Korra." "Is that a no?" |
"We good?" "Yeah, Twinkletoes. We're good." |
Other relationships include a cute love between Bolin and Toph's granddaughter, Opal. The two have a similar relationship to Sokka and Suki, with Bolin being the silly doofus that Opal is both embarrassed and charmed by. There's also a hilarious relationship between Bolin and a Water Tribe princess named Eska, but I won't say much about it because it's mostly played for laughs.
But again, it's hilarious. |
Winner: Korra
I'm going to get hate from both sides for what I said about this scene, but that's the internet for you. |
VILLAINS: This seems like another easy win for Korra since I mentioned earlier that the villains' motives in Korra are more relatable than those of Avatar. But motive alone doesn't make a good villain, and a lot of times it's better to have a villain who's more intimidating than identifiable.
"You think I give a flying fart if you understand me?" |
Terror has a new face. And it wears a kabuki mask. |
"Almighty lord of darkness, why do we suck so much?" |
"We deserved more screen time!" |
"Aw yeah, best in show." |
"Maybe we should all start a band." |
"Tremble at my luxurious hairstyle." |
Also, keep in mind that she was only 14 during the events of Avatar. This is a child, making her ending all the more tragic. |
"Time to tip the scales, b****es." |
"I really liked how many times you said honor in that paragraph." |
Winner: Avatar
"You're welcome, guys." |
SIDE CHARACTERS: A lot of fake-out gimmes in this review. This time, you'd think that I'd give the win to Avatar since I've talked about how it's more character-driven than Korra. However, the episodic nature of Avatar means that characters that aren't directly associated with the main team rarely make appearances. Don't get me wrong, there are a lot of good characters outside of Team Avatar: you've got the wacky King Bumi, the beautiful but deadly Kyoshi warrior Suki, Azula's lackeys Mai and Ty Lee, and most notable of all, the wise and lovable Uncle Iroh.
Flashing White Lotus bling before it was cool. |
"Beat that, you young whipper-snappers." |
Korra, on the other hand, has characters practically oozing out, and they are all good at worst and fantastic at best. You have the entire Bei Fong family who get a ton of attention in the later two seasons and have some of the most touching moments in the series, you have Korra's mentor Tenzin and his family who are absolutely adorable and heat-warming, you have hilarious characters like the Water Tribe princess Eska and the eccentric businessman Varrick... the list goes on and on and they all are just an absolute joy to watch.
Varrick is my personal favorite, rivaling Sokka for funniest character in the Avatar franchise. |
Winner: Korra
"Zhu Li! We did the thing!" "They never stood a chance, sir." |
TEAM AVATAR: Let's clarify who counts as Team Avatar. Since I've already used Zuko as a villain, I won't be counting him amongst Avatar's Gaang: that leaves Sokka, Katara, Toph, Momo, and Appa, excluding Aang since the protagonists get their own section. For the Korra Krew, there's Mako, Bolin, Asami, Naga, and Pabu.
Let's start with the Gaang. Katara and Sokka are the first to discover Aang after his hundred year imprisonment in the iceberg. Sokka is the oldest member of the Gaang and shows it by trying to be the leader, especially when it comes to making plans. He also acts as the comedy relief, which creates a unique combination where he's constantly being the butt end of jokes but is also acting as a huge asset to the team, despite his lack of bending ability. He's one of the funniest characters in the franchise and one of the most beloved.
Next is Katara, the mother figure of the group. While not as funny as many of the other characters, Katara acts as emotional support for most of the team and is the one who picks everyone up when all hope seems lost. She has possibly the strongest will of any of the team's members, making her a serious force to be reckoned with. Like any good mother figure, Katara is both nurturing to those in her care and fearsome to any who would do her loved ones harm.
"If any of you next-gen posers lay a finger on Aang, I'll hit you with so much waterbending your grandkids won't be able to get dry." |
"These chumps think they can take us? I've bent pebbles more impressive than you." |
Even the best of friends fight sometimes. |
"I'm not boring. I'm lots of fun. Like... a whole barrel of fun. Really." |
"I'll be a big boy someday. You'll see." |
"I'm like Batman, but prettier." |
"We're adorable. Isn't that enough?" |
Also, why do Mako and Bolin always fight together? We get it: they're brothers, and they make a good team. Please show some diversity in fight pairings, please. |
Winner: Avatar
"You guys are the best. I'll take it from here." |
It all comes down to this. Korra won three points in plot, romance, and side characters, while Avatar won three points in action, villains, and Team Avatar. The tie breaker comes down to one final question: which series has the better protagonist?
PROTAGONIST: We'll start with the original. Aang was twelve when he ran away from the Air Temple because he couldn't deal with the pressure of being the Avatar. This act of selfishness and fear resulted in him being frozen for a hundred years while the world was plunged into war; throughout the series, Aang has to deal with the guilt he feels from having abandoned the world when it needed him most. This sense of responsibility is what drives him to fight against the Fire Nation, despite his upbringing as a peaceful monk. He's still just a kid, though, and lots of times he'll try to put aside his duties so he can just enjoy life like any normal kid would.
A normal kid who's constantly being hunted down by the world's most powerful and corrupt nation. |
Korra is very different from her predecessor. Whereas Aang tried to avoid the responsibility of being the Avatar, Korra wants to embrace it, to the point where she's cocky and prideful of the power she possesses. She finds her progress constantly being held back by those "looking out for her." She trains hard to become the best fighter she can be, but her teachers are afraid that she doesn't understand the spirituality being the Avatar requires. Once she finally gets what she wants and starts getting responsibility, she realizes that being the Avatar isn't as great as she thought, and she has to figure out what she has to do to keep the world in balance despite being a more physically-oriented and hotheaded Avatar.
"I'd really just rather beat the crap out of everything." |
See, an interesting protagonist is always put into conflict with the world around him or her. This tests the character's morals and values; in Aang's case, he was a peaceful person forced into the center of a massive war, and he has to find ways to overcome his challenges without sacrificing what makes him unique. Even in his backstory, Aang was being forced to deal with situations he was not ready for: he was told he was the Avatar, and that burden sent him running from home and being absent during most of the war. He's always having to find a way to fight against the Fire Nation that keeps him from losing his most important characteristics; being a pacifist, he always tries to avoid conflict, and he never kills. It's why his part of the series finale is so intense; we see Aang overcome with the power of the Avatar State, and in his rage he may do something that will tear at his soul for the rest of his life.
You know, like any hero in a family-friendly show would do. |
"I didn't have to punch anything after all. Sorry for earlier, Grandma." |
Winner: Avatar
"We did it! Tea for everyone!" |
CONCLUSION: These were two fantastic series that had a lot to offer. LoK made a lot of progress from its predecessor, but some unfortunate shortcomings just barely held it back from surpassing the greatness of A:TLA. A lot of the fault is on Nickelodeon; season one was originally set to be the entire series, but the popularity of the show was so high they demanded more seasons, leaving the first season largely disconnected from the others. Nick also took the show off the air and put it entirely online during season three, and then they cut the funding for the fourth season to the point where the creators had to make a clip show episode rather than develop character or progress plot. If the creators of this show can get with a company that respects their talent and experience, I would say that we'd see a show that would completely dominate anything else on television. I hope they create more Avatar-related material in the future; until then, I can always rewatch these two incredible shows.
FINAL VERDICT: Avatar: The Last Airbender is the victor, making the original better than the sequel.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)